Donald Trump has appealed to the US Supreme Court to defend his tariff program. He hopes the justices will overturn a ruling that struck down his sweeping trade duties as unlawful.
Struggle over executive power
The administration submitted its petition on Wednesday night. It asks the court to swiftly decide whether a president can impose tariffs without Congress. Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 against Trump. Judges said the authority to set import taxes belongs exclusively to Congress.
Billions could be repaid
The case threatens Trump’s trade and foreign policy goals. It could also require Washington to refund billions collected through tariffs. Trump cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify his actions. That law gives the president power to respond to “unusual and extraordinary” threats. In April, he declared an economic emergency, claiming trade imbalances harmed US manufacturing and endangered security.
Decision delayed for appeal
Although the appeals court ruled against Trump, it postponed enforcement to allow an appeal. “The stakes in this case could not be higher,” Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in Wednesday’s filing. He said the judgment disrupted critical trade negotiations and spread legal uncertainty. He warned it undermined the president’s ability to prevent a looming economic and foreign policy crisis.
Small firms challenge the duties
Small businesses that filed lawsuits argue the tariffs jeopardize their survival. Their lawyers remain confident. “These unlawful duties are inflicting real harm on small businesses,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center. “We hope for a quick resolution for our clients.” If the Supreme Court declines review, the ruling will take effect on October 14.
Past court defeats
In May, the Court of International Trade in New York also ruled the tariffs unlawful. That decision was frozen during appeals. The cases were brought by small firms and a coalition of US states. In April, Trump issued executive orders creating a 10 percent baseline tariff and “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.
International impact
The appeals court also struck down tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump argued they were vital to curb drug imports. Other tariffs, such as those on steel and aluminum, remain in place. They were imposed under a different presidential authority.
